Surgical pathology specimens for gross examination only and exempt from submission: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of current policies in 413 institutions.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVE To survey the scope of current written institutional policies for types of surgical pathology specimens exempt from submission to the laboratory and those that may be examined by gross inspection only. DESIGN AND SETTING In the first quarter of 1997, a total of 413 voluntary participant institutions enrolled in the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes quality improvement program completed a checklist of 115 proffered specimens. Also included was a questionnaire defining demographic, practice, and reimbursement variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The number and types of specimens exempt from submission and submitted for gross examination only based on written institutional policy rather than on unapproved actual practices. RESULTS Most institutions had a written policy for types of specimens deemed exempt from submission to pathology (87.1 %) and for types of specimens subject to gross examination only (76.6%). There was a wide range of numbers of specimen types with a median number of 17 (range, 2-40) in the exempt category and 29 (range, 6-57) in the category of gross examination only. Significantly higher absolute counts of specimens exempt from submission to pathology were reported by institutions with a greater surgical pathology volume in 1996 and by nonteaching institutions. No aspect of practice was associated with numbers of specimens for gross examination only. CONCLUSIONS This Q-Probes study creates a multi-institutional reference database of current practices to assist pathologists and clinical staff in the development of written guidelines pertaining to surgical pathology specimen submission exceptions and gross-only examinations.
منابع مشابه
Mislabeling of cases, specimens, blocks, and slides: a college of american pathologists study of 136 institutions.
CONTEXT Accurate specimen labeling is a major patient-safety initiative by the Joint Commission and the College of American Pathologists. Inadequate specimen labels have led to patient injury from wrong patient diagnosis, wrong side treatment, and delay in diagnosis. OBJECTIVES To quantify the rates of mislabeled cases, specimens, blocks, and slides and to identify the sources of error and th...
متن کاملProtocol for the examination of specimens from patients with neuroblastoma and related neuroblastic tumors.
T College of American Pathologists offers these protocols to assist pathologists in providing clinically useful and relevant information when reporting results of surgical specimen examinations. The College regards the reporting elements in the ‘‘Surgical Pathology Cancer Case Summary (Checklist)’’ portion of the protocols as essential elements of the pathology report. However, the manner in wh...
متن کاملCurrent usage and future trends in gross digital photography in Canada
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to assess the current usage, utilization and future direction of digital photography of gross surgical specimens in pathology laboratories across Canada. METHODS An online survey consisting of 23 multiple choice and free-text questions regarding gross digital photography was sent out to via email to laboratory staff across Canada involved in gross diss...
متن کاملProtocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: a basis for checklists. Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists.
A protocol for the pathologic examination and reporting of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater has been developed by the Cancer Committee of the College of American Pathologists. The protocol incorporates all basic pathology data of diagnostic and prognostic significance appropriate for the treatment of patients with ampullary carcinoma. The purposes of the protocol a...
متن کاملBenchmarking and the laboratory.
This article describes how benchmarking can be used to assess laboratory performance. Two benchmarking schemes are reviewed, the Clinical Benchmarking Company's Pathology Report and the College of American Pathologists' Q-Probes scheme. The Clinical Benchmarking Company's Pathology Report is undertaken by staff based in the clinical management unit, Keele University with appropriate input from ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine
دوره 123 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1999